[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327917156.2446.191.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:52:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Steets <asteets@...advisors.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf: prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) has no effect
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 17:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Steets <asteets@...advisors.com> wrote:
>
> > On 1/28/12 6:01 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >> prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) doesn't appear to
> > >> disable perf event counters. Here is a demonstration
> > >> program:
> > >
> > > btw., what's your usecase?
> >
> > I'm trying to profile a small section of a long-running
> > program. I ran into trouble using call-graph recording and I
> > thought this might be an alternative way of getting what I was
> > after.
>
> That usecase indeed makes sense. Peter, could we allow this for
> privileged tasks, depending on the perf_paranoia settings or
> such?
I really dislike it. The sane way around this would be to allow easy
self-profiling instead of doing things arse about face like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists