[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327921293.2446.202.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:01:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Steets <asteets@...advisors.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf: prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) has no effect
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So, what workflow are you suggesting to Andrew?
Librarize perf record, then in your code do something like:
#include "perf_record.h"
handle = perf_record_init(); /* creates perf events and creates
a record thread that writes samples
to perf.data, consumes env(PERF_*)
for configuration, registers with
at_exit() for cleanup */
if (!handle)
/* burn */
/* do you other code */
perf_record_start(handle);
/* do the bit you want profiled */
perf_record_stop(handle);
Then build with -lperfrecord or so. Not too hard, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists