linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] [GIT PULL] x86/jump label: Paranoid checks and 2 or 5 byte nops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1327936060.22710.165.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:07:40 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] [GIT PULL] x86/jump label: Paranoid checks and 2
 or 5 byte nops

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:48 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > This is the second round with the suggestions made by Peter 
> > and Andrew incorporated (and tested).
> 
> they are crashing my testbox:
> 
> Policy zone: DMA32
> Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda6 earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 
> console=ttyS0,115200 debug initcall_de
> bug sysrq_always_enabled ignore_loglevel selinux=0 
> nmi_watchdog=1 panic=1 3
> sysrq: sysrq always enabled.
> PANIC: early exception 06 rip 10:ffffffff8101546d error 0 cr2 
> f06f53
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 
> 3.3.0-rc1-tip-02083-ga5066f8-dirty #170372
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8101546d>] ? __jump_label_transform+0x81/0x14e
>  [<ffffffff81063ee4>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1f8/0x2cc
>  [<ffffffff8184d19e>] early_idt_handler+0x5e/0x71
>  [<ffffffff8101546d>] ? __jump_label_transform+0x81/0x14e
>  [<ffffffff81015457>] ? __jump_label_transform+0x6b/0x14e
>  [<ffffffff810155f8>] arch_jump_label_transform_static+0x6f/0x77
>  [<ffffffff81865162>] jump_label_init+0x68/0x98
>  [<ffffffff8184d98b>] start_kernel+0x182/0x3b8
>  [<ffffffff8184d2c3>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xae/0xb2
>  [<ffffffff8184d40d>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x146/0x153
> RIP __jump_label_transform+0x81/0x14e
> 
> Do you need the config or is the bug obvious at first sight?

Could you post the exact line of that address?

<ffffffff8101546d>

I know there was some work to default enable some code. I'm not sure how
much made it in. I'm thinking the line you triggered was:
		/*
		 * The location is not a nop that we were expecting,
		 * something went wrong. Crash the box, as something could be
		 * corrupting the kernel.
		 */
		BUG();


It hits this if we enable a nop that is not what we expect it to be.

Yeah, send me the config too, and I'll run this against tip/master with
all the patches applied.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/