[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120130153040.GB15935@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:30:40 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Steets <asteets@...advisors.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) has no effect
Em Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:45:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 12:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > So, what workflow are you suggesting to Andrew?
> > > Librarize perf record, then in your code do something like:
> > > #include "perf_record.h"
> > Maybe. (and then it shouldnt be limited to perf_record.h but
> > should be events.h plus libevents.so or such)
> Yes it should be, you want to reserve the more generic name for less
> narrow interfaces.
Agreed.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists