linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:42:42 +0200
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Stuart Yoder <b08248@...il.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> Hardware specific attributes are intended, but not limited to hardware
> specific drivers. A generic driver that _may_ run on a given hardware
> can use a hardware specific attribute too. If it doesn't run on this
> hardware it will just get -EINVAL back.

That sounds good.

But I'm still not sure what's the advantage of the attribute API on
top of regular, type-safe, dedicated API for every attribute: it
doesn't sound like there's a vast number of attributes, only a
handful, and dedicated API just sound (to me) much more readable and
less prone to error.

But, again, maybe it's only me :)

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/