[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120130170548.GA3355@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:05:48 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add missing block_bio_complete() tracepoint
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:38:57PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 2012-01-29 6:41 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >The block_bio_complete() TP has been missed so long, so that bio-based
> >drivers haven't been able to trace its IO behavior. Add it.
> >
> >In some rare cases, such as loop_switch, @bio->bi_bdev can be NULL.
> >Thus convert it to TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() as Steven suggested.
> >
>
> Now I see that it seems TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() can protect event
> tracing from such condition, but what about other users of the TP
> like blktrace? I think it'll still get NULL pointer dereference on
> bdev_get_queue() after the change, right? If so, convert to T_E_C()
> looks meaningless IMHO. Do I miss something?
Not really following, but the whole point of using
TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() is avoiding the conditional jump when the TP
is disabled. Whether the TP users need to test again / more isn't too
important.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists