[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F26CF3D.4070001@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:11:25 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@...ibm.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 V10] Add ioctl for KVMCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED
On 01/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > This looks racy. The vcpu can remove its kvmclock concurrently with
> > this access, and src will be NULL.
>
> There is no race here (src is member of the vcpu), but arch.time might
> have become invalid. KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE instead of mark_page_dirty
> would indeed be the way to go. Trivial solution, I would say.
>
> However, the concept of "guest stopped" has VM, not VCPU scope.
We're not stopping the guest here, just setting a flag in kvmclock,
which certainly is a per-vcpu thing.
> That
> makes the call more appropriate as a VM ioctl. If that thing should
> really become per-vcpu, at least call it KVMCLOCK_VCPU_STOPPED.
>
All current ioctls start with KVM_. Maybe KVM_KVMCLOCK_CTRL?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists