linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: tidspbridge: Lindent to drv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:25:34 -0600
From:	"Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>
To:	Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Armando Uribe <x0095078@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
	Ivan Gomez Castellanos <ivan.gomez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: tidspbridge: Lindent to drv_interface.c

2012/1/23 Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>:
> No functional changes.
>
> According to Lindent, the file drv_internface.c had some lines with bad
> indentation.
>
> This commit is the output of Lindent.

Usually lindent tends to do whatever it wants, unless carefully configured...

...
> @@ -342,9 +342,10 @@ static void bridge_recover(struct work_struct *work)
>        if (atomic_read(&bridge_cref)) {
>                INIT_COMPLETION(bridge_comp);
>                while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&bridge_comp,
> -                                               msecs_to_jiffies(REC_TIMEOUT)))
> -                       pr_info("%s:%d handle(s) still opened\n",
> -                                       __func__, atomic_read(&bridge_cref));
> +                                                   msecs_to_jiffies
> +                                                   (REC_TIMEOUT)))

Like here, it just split msecs_to_jiffies(REC_TIMEOUT) into 2 lines
making it a little harder to read.

> +                       pr_info("%s:%d handle(s) still opened\n", __func__,
> +                               atomic_read(&bridge_cref));

I remember the rule was to break lines as far to the right as
possible, no? Chapter 2 CodingStyle, same for the other similar
changes.

...
> @@ -547,10 +548,9 @@ static int __devexit omap34_xx_bridge_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                pr_err("%s: Failed to retrieve the object handle\n", __func__);
>                goto func_cont;
>        }
> -

Blank line removed?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE_DVFS
>        if (cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&iva_clk_notifier,
> -                                               CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER))
> +                                       CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER))
>                pr_err("%s: cpufreq_unregister_notifier failed for iva2_ck\n",
>                       __func__);
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE_DVFS */
> --
> 1.7.8.3
>

Regards,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/