[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327960736.5355.5.camel@lenny>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:58:54 -0500
From: Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>, keescook@...omium.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com,
djm@...drot.org, segoon@...nwall.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, avi@...hat.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, khilman@...com, borislav.petkov@....com,
amwang@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, gregkh@...e.de, dhowells@...hat.com,
daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
mhalcrow@...gle.com, dlaor@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Allow unprivileged chroot when safe
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:17 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Chroot can easily be used to subvert setuid programs. If no_new_privs,
> then setuid programs don't gain any privilege, so allow chroot.
Is this needed/desired by anyone now, or are you just using it to "demo"
NO_NEW_PRIVS? I don't see it as very useful on its own, since in any
"container"-type chroot you really want /proc and /dev, and your patch
doesn't help with that.
System daemons that do chroot for a modicum of security already start
privileged, so this doesn't help them either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists