[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120130140128.037aca27.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:01:28 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@....ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of rw_copy_check_uvector and
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:23:37 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 01/30, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> >
> > ssize_t compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(int type,
> > const struct compat_iovec __user *uvector, unsigned long nr_segs,
> > unsigned long fast_segs, struct iovec *fast_pointer,
> > - struct iovec **ret_pointer, int check_access)
> > + struct iovec **ret_pointer)
> > {
> > compat_ssize_t tot_len;
> > struct iovec *iov = *ret_pointer = fast_pointer;
> > @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ ssize_t compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(int type,
> > }
> > if (len < 0) /* size_t not fitting in compat_ssize_t .. */
> > goto out;
> > - if (check_access &&
> > + if (type >=0 &&
>
> I bet checkpatch.pl will complain, this needs the space after '>' ;)
>
> Otherwise this is nice cleanup, imho.
>
> Christopher, this is up to Andrew but perhaps you should update
> the changelog. It should explain what this patch does (overload
> "int type", remove the unnecessary "check_access", etc). It should
> not simply mention the previous discussion.
>
Yes please. Put oneself in the position of a developer reading the
changelog two years from now.
Also, please use our conventional comment layout style in fs.h.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists