[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAObL_7F-vXXbkj8-9xsrxETyUka5xQ0jD9teN_Li50QzRYZugw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:29:54 -0800
From: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, john.johansen@...onical.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, djm@...drot.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, segoon@...nwall.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, jmorris@...ei.org, scarybeasts@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, khilman@...com,
borislav.petkov@....com, amwang@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, gregkh@...e.de,
dhowells@...hat.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
mhalcrow@...gle.com, dlaor@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, mcgrathr@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF
[not quoting anything because this is a more general question]
How portable across architectures is this supposed to be? At least
syscall numbering varies widely, and calling conventions can be
different (x86_64 has four of them, for example). For all I know,
argument order might be different in some cases.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists