[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120130141619.a35863e2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:16:19 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Tuner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Add num_to_str() for speedup /proc/stat
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:00 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:09:33 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > > I expect most of these numbers are zero. I wonder if we would get
> > > useful speedups from
> > >
> > > for_each_irq_nr(j) {
> > > /* Apologetic comment goes here */
> > > if (kstat_irqs(j))
> > > seq_printf(p, " %u", kstat_irqs(j));
> > > else
> > > seq_puts(p, " 0");
> > > }
> >
> > Yes. This is very good optimization and shows much optimization.
> > I did this at first try but did complicated ones because it seems
> > not interesting. (This is my bad habit...)
> >
> > I'll try again and measure time.
>
> seq_puts() is too slow ;) I bet seq_putc(p, ' ');seq_putc(p, '0') will
> complete in negative time.
How about this ? I think this is simple enough.
=
>From d1f215d4279152362721fd2ca74241fe85afe2ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:15:12 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Add num_to_str() for speedup /proc/stat
At reading /proc/stat, most of time is consumed by vsnprintf() at el.
Here is a test script, reading /proc/stat 1000 times..
== stat_check.py
num = 0
with open("/proc/stat") as f:
while num < 1000 :
data = f.read()
f.seek(0, 0)
num = num + 1
==
perf shows
20.39% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] format_decode
13.41% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] number
12.61% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] vsnprintf
10.85% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] memcpy
4.85% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] radix_tree_lookup
4.43% stat_check.py [kernel.kallsyms] [k] seq_printf
This patch removes most of calls to vsnprintf() by adding
num_to_str() and seq_print_decimal_ull(), which prints decimal numbers
without rich functions provided by printf().
On my 8cpu box.
== Before patch ==
[root@...extal test]# time ./stat_check.py
real 0m0.150s
user 0m0.026s
sys 0m0.121s
== After patch ==
[root@...extal test]# time ./stat_check.py
real 0m0.055s
user 0m0.022s
sys 0m0.030s
Maybe it's worth to add this simple function.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
fs/seq_file.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/kernel.h | 8 ++++++
include/linux/seq_file.h | 5 +++-
lib/vsprintf.c | 14 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 121f77c..0ff3b92 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -89,18 +89,19 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
}
sum += arch_irq_stat();
- seq_printf(p, "cpu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
- "%llu\n",
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
+ seq_puts(p, "cpu ");
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(user));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(nice));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(system));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(idle));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(irq));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(steal));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
+ seq_putc(p, '\n');
+
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
/* Copy values here to work around gcc-2.95.3, gcc-2.96 */
user = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_USER];
@@ -113,26 +114,24 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
steal = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL];
guest = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST];
guest_nice = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE];
- seq_printf(p,
- "cpu%d %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
- "%llu\n",
- i,
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
- (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
+ seq_printf(p, "cpu %d", i);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(user));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(nice));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(system));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(idle));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(irq));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(steal));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
+ seq_putc(p, '\n');
}
seq_printf(p, "intr %llu", (unsigned long long)sum);
/* sum again ? it could be updated? */
for_each_irq_nr(j)
- seq_printf(p, " %u", kstat_irqs(j));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', kstat_irqs(j));
seq_printf(p,
"\nctxt %llu\n"
@@ -149,7 +148,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
seq_printf(p, "softirq %llu", (unsigned long long)sum_softirq);
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++)
- seq_printf(p, " %u", per_softirq_sums[i]);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', per_softirq_sums[i]);
seq_putc(p, '\n');
return 0;
diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
index 4023d6b..a1ccb48 100644
--- a/fs/seq_file.c
+++ b/fs/seq_file.c
@@ -642,6 +642,40 @@ int seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_puts);
+/*
+ * A helper routine for putting decimal numbers without rich format of printf().
+ * only 'unsigned long long' is supported.
+ * This routine will put one byte delimiter + number into seq_file.
+ * This routine is very quick when you show lots of numbers.
+ * In usual cases, it will be better to use seq_printf(). It's easier to read.
+ */
+int seq_put_decimal_ull(struct seq_file *m, char delimiter,
+ unsigned long long num)
+{
+ int len;
+
+ if (m->count + 2 >= m->size) /* we'll write 2 bytes at least */
+ goto overflow;
+
+ if (num < 10) {
+ m->buf[m->count++] = delimiter;
+ m->buf[m->count++] = num + '0';
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ m->buf[m->count++] = delimiter;
+
+ len = num_to_str(m->buf + m->count, m->size - m->count, num);
+ if (!len)
+ goto overflow;
+ m->count += len;
+ return 0;
+overflow:
+ m->count = m->size;
+ return -1;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_put_decimal_ull);
+
/**
* seq_write - write arbitrary data to buffer
* @seq: seq_file identifying the buffer to which data should be written
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index e834342..bb2da3f 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -299,6 +299,14 @@ extern long long simple_strtoll(const char *,char **,unsigned int);
#define strict_strtoull kstrtoull
#define strict_strtoll kstrtoll
+/*
+ * Convert passed number to decimal string.
+ * returns returns the length of string. at buffer overflow, returns 0.
+ *
+ * If speed is not important, use snprintf(). It's easy to read the code.
+ */
+extern int num_to_str(char *buf, int size, unsigned long long num);
+
/* lib/printf utilities */
extern __printf(2, 3) int sprintf(char *buf, const char * fmt, ...);
diff --git a/include/linux/seq_file.h b/include/linux/seq_file.h
index 44f1514..b58a95c 100644
--- a/include/linux/seq_file.h
+++ b/include/linux/seq_file.h
@@ -122,8 +122,11 @@ void *__seq_open_private(struct file *, const struct seq_operations *, int);
int seq_open_private(struct file *, const struct seq_operations *, int);
int seq_release_private(struct inode *, struct file *);
-#define SEQ_START_TOKEN ((void *)1)
+/* defined in lib/vsprintf.c */
+int seq_put_decimal_ull(struct seq_file *m, char delimiter,
+ unsigned long long num);
+#define SEQ_START_TOKEN ((void *)1)
/*
* Helpers for iteration over list_head-s in seq_files
*/
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 8e75003..ffb81b1 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -212,6 +212,20 @@ char *put_dec(char *buf, unsigned long long num)
}
}
+int num_to_str(char *buf, int size, unsigned long long num)
+{
+ char tmp[66];
+ int idx, len;
+
+ len = put_dec(tmp, num) - tmp;
+
+ if (len > size)
+ return 0;
+ for (idx = 0; idx < len; ++idx)
+ buf[idx] = tmp[len - idx - 1];
+ return len;
+}
+
#define ZEROPAD 1 /* pad with zero */
#define SIGN 2 /* unsigned/signed long */
#define PLUS 4 /* show plus */
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists