lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOwKts8zS1rYA+Y4k-vb8YAaR=aFd1BwryhhWWnWLQyrYrNqyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:28:09 +0800
From:	TAO HU <tghk48@...orola.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: In many cases softlockup can not be reported after disabling IRQ for
 long time

Resend with a new subject

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, TAO HU <tghk48@...orola.com> wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> While playing kernel 3.0.8 with below test code, it does NOT report
> any softlockup with 60%~70% chances.
> NOTE: the softlockup timeout is set to 10 seconds (i.e.
> watchdog_thresh=5) in my test.
> ... ...
> preempt_disable();
> local_irq_disable();
> for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
>       mdelay(1000);
> local_irq_enable();
> preempt_enable();
> ... ...
>
> However, if I remove local_irq_disable()/local_irq_enable() it will
> report softlockup with no problem.
> I believe it is due to that after local_irq_enable()
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() is called prior softlockup timer.
>
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() basically resets the lockup detection
> process which implies that the 20-second lockup will be ignored.
> I noticed that touch_softlockup_watchdog() is called in dozens of
> places in kernel.
>
> Is that a design limitation or a bug? Any way to improve the situation?
>
> kernel/debug/debug_core.c:453:  touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
> kernel/power/hibernate.c:443:   touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/panic.c:153:             touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:684:  touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:149:   touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:543:   touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:596:           touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:756:                   touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> kernel/sched_clock.c:277:       touch_softlockup_watchdog();
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Hu Tao



-- 
Best Regards
Hu Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ