[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120131000319.GH7827@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:03:19 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Sleep: Freeze filesystems during system
suspend/hibernation
On Tue 31-01-12 08:10:37, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 31/01/12 08:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 30, 2012, Jan Kara wrote:
> >> On Sat 28-01-12 14:45:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Freeze in reverse order so filesystems depending on others are
> >>> + * frozen in the right order (eg. loopback on ext3).
> >>> + */
> >> Ho, hum, are you sure the order in super_blocks list is the one you need?
> >> Maybe it is but I'm not sure you are guaranteed it is.
> >
> > Well, is there any way I can get the right order?
>
> Jan, what's the case where the reverse of mount order might be the wrong
> order?
After some though, I'm not able to come up with a counterexample. As I
wrote to Rafael, let's at least document that we rely on some ordering of
super_blocks list.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists