linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform: add common resource requesting and mapping helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zM=6ivn0uCtP4wsS67U77uHd5nVZQ-LP1vS07AE3dMxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:09:19 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@....com,
	Erik Gilling <konkers@...gle.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform: add common resource requesting and mapping helper

hi Wolfram,

2012/1/31 Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>:
> Barry,
>
>> > You don't need to do the error checking for 'res'. You can simply do
>> >
>> > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> > base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&dev->dev, res);
>>
>> i do know  devm_request_and_ioremap() does res checking. but that is
>> implicit, confused and not a smart way actually.
>
> I agree about the implicit thing (keep in mind the function is new). But
> calling a function "not smart" because it checks its arguments? I do
> like the NULL check of kfree() for example.

i didn't mean it is not smart for devm_request_and_ioremap() to check
its param. that is definitely ok.
i mean it is not smart for people to depend on another function to do
implicit check on what they should check by themselves.
>
>> actually, no people by now really use the implicit checking. that
>> shows people don't really think that is a good programming way.
>
> I'd think most people just copy&paste and don't have an opinion either
> way, so the quantity doesn't show much.
>
>> > devm_request_and_ioremap() will check res. Given that, I don't think
>> > we can save a lot with another wrapper.
>>
>> i think we can save some.
>> The story begins from Grant's feedback in:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg157644.html
>
> I am not sure using 'platform_devm_request_and_ioremap' and later using
> plain 'devm_*' functions (without platform_-prefix) is less confusing.
> The alternative would be to check which helper functions also use
> 'struct resource' and if they do checks on that. If all do that, you
> would have the simple rule, that you only need to check yourself if you
> access it yourself.

it is just a helper, just like clk_disable_unprepare() which do
clk_disable() + clk_unprepare().

>
> Regards,
>
>   Wolfram
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/