[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120131122039.GA12706@localhost>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:20:39 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:57:16AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:42:56PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > So what? Better do a bit more work now and keep the damn thing
> > > maintainable.
> >
> > What if we add a wrapper function for doing
> >
> > blk_start_plug(&plug);
> > ->direct_IO()
> > blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> No. Just put it into __blockdev_direct_IO - a quick 2 minute audit of
> the kernel source shows that is in fact the only ->direct_IO instance
> which ever submits block I/O anyway.
Right, so nice point!
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists