linux-kernel - Re: x86: clean up smpboot.c's use of udelay+schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328014076.2446.210.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:47:56 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	arjanvandeven@...il.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: clean up smpboot.c's use of udelay+schedule

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 13:43 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > >From 9f8dd2b15ff19ad73ee0eb235b4fdde9277185e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:38:09 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: clean up smpboot.c's use of udelay+schedule
> > 
> > smpboot.c does a udelay() followed by a schedule(); to yield
> > the CPU to other threads. This comes from the time when the kernel
> > did not yet have usleep_*() style APIs...
> > 
> > ... nowadays, the kernel can do better than this, and this
> > patch replaces this code sequence with a usleep_range(),
> > so that the CPU is actually yielded for some real time.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    3 +--
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index 66d250c..0b794c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -781,14 +781,13 @@ do_rest:
> >  		for (timeout = 0; timeout < 50000; timeout++) {
> >  			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callin_mask))
> >  				break;	/* It has booted */
> > -			udelay(100);
> >  			/*
> >  			 * Allow other tasks to run while we wait for the
> >  			 * AP to come online. This also gives a chance
> >  			 * for the MTRR work(triggered by the AP coming online)
> >  			 * to be completed in the stop machine context.
> >  			 */
> > -			schedule();
> > +			usleep_range(100, 200);
> 
> I'm wondering whether we could shorten this delay to say 10 
> usecs and thus save 0.1 msecs (or more) from a typical SMP 
> bootup?

wait_on_completion_timeout() and have the fresh cpu do a wakeup when its
done. That way there's no need for a minimal wait time.

Anyway, all the cpu hotplug code is a friggin trainwreck and needs a
complete rewrite across all archs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/