[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328014916.2446.217.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:01:56 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
arjanvandeven@...il.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: clean up smpboot.c's use of udelay+schedule
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 13:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Wanna give a short TODO list to anyone wanting to work on that?
I paged out most details again, but it goes something like:
- read and understand the current generic code
- and all architecture code, at which point you'll probably boggle
at all the similarities that are all subtly different (there's
about 3 actually different ways in the arch code).
- pick one, preferably one that keeps additional state and doesn't
fully rely on the online bits and pull it into generic code and
provide a small vector of arch specific functions.
- convert all archs over.
Also related:
- figure out why cpu_down needs kstopmachine, I'm not sure it does..
we should be able to tear down a cpu using synchronize_sched() and a
single stop_one_cpu(). (someday when there's time I might actually
try to implement this).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists