[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F28102C.1070207@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:00:44 +0000
From: Niels de Vos <ndevos@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device
if fsync() is called for a partition
On 01/26/2012 09:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:40:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> The Right Thing To Do here is to make the kernel behave logically and
>> predictably, then modify the userspace tools. But if we're modifying
>> the userspace tools then we would just change userspace to issue a
>> BLKFLSBUF to /dev/sda and leave the kernel alone.
>
> The right fix is to make partition and whole disk access coherent,
> which is fairly simply:
>
> - create the block device inode/mapping per gendisk, and only reference
> count it per block_device
> - make sure blkdev_get_block(s) applies the correct offset if used on
> partitions
>
This surely looks like a better way to fix this issue. I am not sure yet
how much work that would involve and if I am the right person to fix
this. If nobody beats me to it, I might send a patch for review some
(undefined) time later.
Thanks for the suggestions,
Niels
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists