[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120131193748.GA10093@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:37:48 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Niels de Vos <ndevos@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device if
fsync() is called for a partition
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:32:50AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I didn't say the kernel would support this as-is.
>
> If the partitioning scheme requires writing to the individual
> partitions then something would need to be done, such as a simple
> offsetting DM driver.
Writing partition tables requires writing to them main block device.
Seriously - if people want to support block devices nodes > 16TB dealing
with this isn't the problem. They'll need to find a way to do buffered
I/O without using the pagecache to get it right, at which point
blkdev_get_block in either form will simply go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists