linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scheduler: domain: init next_balance in nohz_idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328040199.2446.243.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:03:19 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@...dia.com>
Cc:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Kamalesh Babulal' <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scheduler: domain: init next_balance in
 nohz_idle_balancer with jiffies

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:18 -0800, Diwakar Tundlam wrote:
> Yes, the change should be ported to kernel/sched/fair.c under
> init_sched_fair_class(). But that's for 3.3. I will send a separate
> patch for 3.3 shortly.
> 
Patches are sent against the current (3.3-rc) or next (3.4) development
trees, anything older can possibly get backports through the stable
stuff but is completely irrelevant for patch submission.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/