[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F285310.5060104@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:46:08 -0800
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Disambiguate kernel message
On 1/31/12 12:09 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> + too_many_orphans = tcp_too_many_orphans(sk, shift);
>> + out_of_socket_memory = tcp_out_of_memory(sk);
>> + tcp_log_oom(too_many_orphans, out_of_socket_memory);
>> + if (too_many_orphans || out_of_socket_memory) {
>
> Perhaps these repeated three lines should be a routine like:
>
> bool tcp_check_oom(struct sock *sk, int shift)
> {
> bool tcp_orphans = tcp_too_many_orphans(sk, shift);
> bool tcp_oom = tcp_out_of_memory(sk);
>
> printks...
>
> return tcp_orphans || tcp_oom;
> }
I like your previous suggestion better. It preserves the ability to write:
if (too_many_orphans) {
do_something();
}
if (out_of_socket_memory) {
do_something_else();
}
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists