[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6srOi97g1OHDAULLcGP95ZGb8AJVURRFJt062HiN43wSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:55 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@....com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
Erik Gilling <konkers@...gle.com>,
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform: add common resource requesting and mapping helper
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com> wrote:
>
>> From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
>>
>> this patch helps to move the common pattern from
>
> Good idea!
>
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ extern struct device platform_bus;
>>
>> extern void arch_setup_pdev_archdata(struct platform_device *);
>> extern struct resource *platform_get_resource(struct platform_device *, unsigned int, unsigned int);
>> +extern void __iomem *platform_devm_request_and_ioremap(struct platform_device *, unsigned int);
>
> But don't you want a reverse call for the module remove() function?
>
> Like:
>
> extern void __iomem *platform_devm_iounmap_and_free(struct
> platform_device *, unsigned int);
I wouldn't because it is exactly the same as the normal unwind call.
I don't think the name redirection buys us anything here.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists