[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120201070918.GA7399@quad.lixom.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:09:18 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor when
stopping.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 02:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM:
> >>It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID
> >>option before stopping dma.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@...dia.com>
> >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@...dia.com>
> >Tested-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@...dia.com>
> >
> >I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no
> >reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing
> >an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according
> >to HW, that isn't a concern.
> >
> Olaf,
> Can it be applied if it is OK to you?
Yep, applied.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists