linux-kernel - Re: VFs go missing with latest kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F288C4A.3070509@cisco.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:50:18 -0700
From:	David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To:	"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VFs go missing with latest kernel

On 01/31/2012 05:43 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
>>
>> Back to the missing VF problem: reverting the patch I mentioned before
>> and my VM boots up fine with the even-numbered VFs assigned to it.
> 
> OK, thanks... I was staring at the dmesg output you sent me and it is odd because the even numbered VFs that go missing are there when you set their MAC addresses.  See output below the dotted line after my reply.

Ah, I think I confused you. The VFs for the first 2 ports (ie., the
first 14 VFs) are seen fine; I only showed the VFs for the second 2
ports -- which are missing the even number.

So, in summary I am missing 7 VFs all associated with the even numbers
on the last ports of a quad port card.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/