[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B6E45@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:04:48 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Danny Kukawka" <danny.kukawka@...ect.de>,
"Karsten Keil" <kkeil@...ux-pingi.de>
Cc: "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"Armin Schindler" <mac@...ware.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Karsten Keil" <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/16] eicon: fix -Warray-bounds warning
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
> [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Danny Kukawka
> Sent: 31 January 2012 17:04
> To: Karsten Keil
> Cc: Ben Hutchings; Armin Schindler;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Karsten Keil
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] eicon: fix -Warray-bounds warning
>
> On Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, Karsten Keil wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:09:32PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 23:00 +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > > Fix for a -Warray-bounds warning. mixer_notify_update() tries to
> > > > write to ((CAPI_MSG *) msg)->info.facility_req.structs[3] while
> > > > structs is defined as byte structs[1], define structs[1] as
> > > > structs[4].
> > >
> > > I suspect that all the 'byte structs[1];' fields defined
> in that header
> > > are actually variable-length arrays. In that case, there
> may be no
> > > reasonable bound you can specify.
> >
> > Yes, exactely, the structs is a ASN1 coded message so it
> can have any len.
>
> So, how can we get rid of the compiler warning then?
Try defining it as a 'variable sized array' - byte structs[0].
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists