linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] move vm tools from Documentation/vm/ to tools/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F290BA8.9030606@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:53:44 +0800
From:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move vm tools from Documentation/vm/ to tools/

On 02/01/2012 04:44 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>> Will git-mv end up with a better commit?
> 
> Just use
> 
>     git format-patch -C


good idea, patch looks clean with -C. So there should be no much problem
for review. Also because there's also Makefile changes, I want to still
send as one patch with all changes. How do you think?

> 
> to generate the patch and it should be fine.
> 
>>> BTW, I think tools/slub/slabinfo.c should be included in tools/vm/ as
>>> well, will move it in v2 patch
>>
>> CC Christoph. Maybe not a big deal since it's already under tools/.
> 
> I'm certainly fine with moving it to tools/vm.



-- 
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/