[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120201010803.GD32295@andromeda.dapyr.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:08:03 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen pvhvm: do not remap pirqs onto evtchns if !xen_have_vector_callback
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:40:26PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:31:46PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> >
> > So the xen_have_vector_callback looks to be only set by
> >
> > 1398 if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_hvm_callback_vector))
> > 1399 xen_have_vector_callback = 1;
> >
> > So could this be just done via a check for that instead?
> >
>
> Sure, but I don't think it would be better: using
> xen_have_vector_callback is more consistent and give us the flexibility
> of allowing users to manually override it in the future.
ok. applied. Hm, I was thinking to put on stable@...nel.org - but how
far back should it go? 2.6.37?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists