[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F291B92.8070402@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:01:38 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] srcu: Implement call_srcu()
On 02/01/2012 01:00 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>
>> rcu_assign_pointer), and use atomic operations to copy and clear:
>>
>> word = bitmap[i]
>> put_user(word)
>> atomic_and(&bitmap[i], ~word)
>>
>>
>
> This kind of this was really slow IIRC.
>
>
> How about just doing:
>
> take a spin_lock
> copy the entire (or some portions of) bitmap locally
> clear the bitmap
> unlock
>
That means that vcpus dirtying memory also have to take that lock, and
spin while the bitmap is being copied. So kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
will become faster, at the expense of vcpus, which I think is a bad
tradeoff.
> write protect the dirty pages based on the copied dirty data
>
> copy_to_user
>
>
>
> I can show you some performance numbers, this weekend, if you like.
That'll be great, numbers are better than speculation.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists