linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] [GIT PULL] x86/jump label: Paranoid checks and 2 or 5 byte nops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328102419.5882.60.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:20:19 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] [GIT PULL] x86/jump label: Paranoid checks and 2
 or 5 byte nops

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 09:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> It would be better to make this a regular commit, this kind of 
> diagnostics obviously makes sense. That way i could pull in your 
> updated branch for more testing.

Actually, I was planing on doing that ;-) I just didn't have the time to
push it through my normal testing.

I'm also curious if you get a bug with only patches 1,2, and 3. That is,
the current jump label doesn't do any testing. It would be interesting
to know if something is happening with the current jump label code that
we do not expect.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/