[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120201144925.GE17170@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:49:25 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@...ricsson.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...ericsson.com>,
Alex Macro <alex.macro@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd/ab8500: support AB9540 variant
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:42:59PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> For newer ASICs we solve it by not providing platform data
> and instead fall back to reading chip revision.
Given all that it sounds like it'd be more accurate to say that for old
chips we fall back on platform data - fall back sounds like it's a
failure mode but it seems like the opposite is true.
A more idiomatic way of doing this would be to register the device with
the appropriate name and then use driver data in the i2c_device_id to
pick the appropriate variant data up - this has the added bonus of
getting you a free device tree binding.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists