[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202011527.35366.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:27:35 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <greg@...ah.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lkdtm: use atomic_t to replace count_lock
On Wednesday 01 February 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> static void lkdtm_handler(void)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&count_lock, flags);
> - count--;
> printk(KERN_INFO "lkdtm: Crash point %s of type %s hit, trigger in %d rounds\n",
> - cp_name_to_str(cpoint), cp_type_to_str(cptype), count);
> + cp_name_to_str(cpoint), cp_type_to_str(cptype), atomic_dec_return(&count));
>
> - if (count == 0) {
> + if (!atomic_cmpxchg(&count, 0, cpoint_count))
> lkdtm_do_action(cptype);
> - count = cpoint_count;
> - }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&count_lock, flags);
> }
This use is not atomic, you could have two threads doing atomic_dec_return
at the same time, and after that the value will be -1 so the atomic_cmpxchg
does not trigger.
In order to have an atomic here, you have to use a loop around
atomic_cmpxchg, like
int old, new;
old = atomic_read(&count);
do {
new = old ? old - 1 : cpoint_count;
old = cmpxchg(&count, old, new);
} while (old != new);
I suppose you could also just keep the spinlock and move lkdtm_do_action()
outside of it?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists