[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202011657.36998.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:57:36 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Ohad Ben-Cohen" <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc: "linux-arm" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
On Wednesday 01 February 2012, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > If you think you need more Acks or if there are other
> > reasons to have it go through arm-soc, please tell me and I'll try harder
> > to find the time for a proper review.
>
> Any chance you could carve out some time for reviewing remoteproc and
> rpmsg [1] ?
I will.
> I hope we could either get your Acks on the patches or even have it go
> through arm-soc for 3.4.
Yes, I think it's best to have it merged through arm-soc, in case Linus
is more likely to take it from there than pull from your tree.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists