[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120201.130905.1131458895704793597.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:09:05 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: matz@...e.de
Cc: jkosina@...e.cz, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, walters@...bum.org,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, dsterba@...e.cz, ptesarik@...e.cz,
rguenther@...e.de, gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
From: Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:41:05 +0100 (CET)
> One problem is that it's not a new problem, GCC emitted similar code since
> about forever, and still they turned up only now (well, probably because
> ia64 is dead, but sparc64 should have similar problems).
Indeed, on sparc64 it does do the silly 64-bit access too:
wrong:
ldx [%o0+8], %g2
sethi %hi(2147483648), %g1
or %g2, %g1, %g1
jmp %o7+8
stx %g1, [%o0+8]
Personally I've avoided C bitfields like the plague in any code I've
written.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists