| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1328125319-5205-38-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:41:56 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 38/41] rcu: Rework detection of use of RCU by offline CPUs
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Because newly offlined CPUs continue executing after completing the
CPU_DYING notifiers, they legitimately enter the scheduler and use
RCU while appearing to be offline. This calls for a more sophisticated
approach as follows:
1. RCU marks the CPU online during the CPU_UP_PREPARE phase.
2. RCU marks the CPU offline during the CPU_DEAD phase.
3. Diagnostics regarding use of read-side RCU by offline CPUs use
RCU's accounting rather than the cpu_online_map. (Note that
__call_rcu() still uses cpu_online_map to detect illegal
invocations within CPU_DYING notifiers.)
4. Offline CPUs are prevented from hanging the system by
force_quiescent_state(), which pays attention to cpu_online_map.
Some additional work (in a later commit) will be needed to
guarantee that force_quiescent_state() waits a full jiffy before
assuming that a CPU is offline, for example, when called from
idle entry.
This approach avoids the false positives encountered when attempting to
use more exact classification of CPU online/offline state.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 632b1c3..ce39431 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -604,19 +604,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_is_cpu_idle);
* this task being preempted, its old CPU being taken offline, resuming
* on some other CPU, then determining that its old CPU is now offline.
* It is OK to use RCU on an offline processor during initial boot, hence
- * the check for rcu_scheduler_fully_active.
+ * the check for rcu_scheduler_fully_active. Note also that it is OK
+ * for a CPU coming online to use RCU for one jiffy prior to marking itself
+ * online in the cpu_online_mask. Similarly, it is OK for a CPU going
+ * offline to continue to use RCU for one jiffy after marking itself
+ * offline in the cpu_online_mask. This leniency is necessary given the
+ * non-atomic nature of the online and offline processing, for example,
+ * the fact that a CPU enters the scheduler after completing the CPU_DYING
+ * notifiers.
+ *
+ * This is also why RCU internally marks CPUs online during the
+ * CPU_UP_PREPARE phase and offline during the CPU_DEAD phase.
*
* Disable checking if in an NMI handler because we cannot safely report
* errors from NMI handlers anyway.
*/
bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void)
{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
bool ret;
if (in_nmi())
return 1;
preempt_disable();
- ret = cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) ||
+ rdp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_sched_data);
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ ret = (rdp->grpmask & rnp->qsmaskinit) ||
!rcu_scheduler_fully_active;
preempt_enable();
return ret;
@@ -1311,14 +1325,12 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
*/
static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
- unsigned long flags;
int i;
unsigned long mask;
- int need_report;
int receive_cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask);
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
struct rcu_data *receive_rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, receive_cpu);
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* For dying CPU. */
+ RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode); /* For dying CPU. */
/* First, adjust the counts. */
if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) {
@@ -1384,32 +1396,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
"cpuofl");
rcu_report_qs_rdp(smp_processor_id(), rsp, rdp, rsp->gpnum);
/* Note that rcu_report_qs_rdp() might call trace_rcu_grace_period(). */
-
- /*
- * Remove the dying CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node
- * hierarchy. Because we are in stop_machine() context, we
- * automatically exclude ->onofflock critical sections.
- */
- do {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
- if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- break;
- }
- if (rnp == rdp->mynode) {
- need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp);
- if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP)
- rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
- else
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP)
- rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, true);
- } else
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- mask = rnp->grpmask;
- rnp = rnp->parent;
- } while (rnp != NULL);
}
/*
@@ -1420,11 +1406,53 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
*/
static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long mask;
+ int need_report = 0;
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rnp. */
+ /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */
rcu_stop_cpu_kthread(cpu);
rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
+
+ /* Remove the dying CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */
+
+ /* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
+
+ /* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */
+ mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */
+ do {
+ raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
+ if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) {
+ if (rnp != rdp->mynode)
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+ break;
+ }
+ if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
+ need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+ else
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+ mask = rnp->grpmask;
+ rnp = rnp->parent;
+ } while (rnp != NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * We still hold the leaf rcu_node structure lock here, and
+ * irqs are still disabled. The reason for this subterfuge is
+ * because invoking rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() with ->onofflock
+ * held leads to deadlock.
+ */
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP)
+ rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
+ else
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP)
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, true);
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 3dc58cc..56a63bc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
* absolutely necessary, but this is a good performance/complexity
* tradeoff.
*/
- if (rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
+ if (rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp) && rnp->qsmask == 0)
retval |= RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP;
if (rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp))
retval |= RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP;
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists