[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120201115403.d140742e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:54:03 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Make run_tests executable
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:24:53 +0100
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:51:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:29 +0100
> > Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Make the main script that launches the tests to
> > > become executable. Otherwise people need to launch
> > > it as an argument to a new bash instance.
> > >
> >
> > That's a feature ;)
> >
> > The x bit can easily get lost on kernel scripts. For example, if
> > someone upgrades their kernel with patch(1) and the patch adds or
> > renames the script, the x bit gets lost.
> >
> > If we were to set the x bit for the subset of people who get their
> > scripts direct from a git repository then those people might write and
> > distribute tools which fail when used by people who have lost their x
> > bit. I've seen this happen at least once before.
> >
>
> I see. Another way could be to chmod the run_test script from the Makefile.
> Would that sound clumsy?
I suggest we remove the script and make it a makefile target instead.
"make tests" or whatever. As a microbonus that would remove the need
to duplicate the TARGETS definition in the two scripts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists