linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:13:32 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 04:18:07AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:36:53PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > I still see that IO is being submitted one page at a time. The only
>> > real difference seems to be that queue unplug happening at random times
>> > and many a times we are submitting much smaller requests (40 sectors, 48
>> > sectors etc).
>> 
>> This is expected given that the block device node uses
>> block_read_full_page, and not mpage_readpage(s).
>
> What is the difference between block_read_full_page() and
> mpage_readpage(). IOW, why block device does not use mpage_readpage(s)
> interface?
>
> Is enabling mpage_readpages() on block devices is as simple as following
> patch or more is involved? (I suspect it has to be more than this. If it
> was this simple, it would have been done by now).
>
> This patch complies and seems to work. (system does not crash and dd
> seems to be working. I can't verify the contents of the file though).
>
> Applying following patch improved the speed from 110MB/s to more than
> 230MB/s.
>
> # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1K
> 1024+0 records in
> 1024+0 records out
> 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.6269 s, 232 MB/s

See:
commit db2dbb12dc47a50c7a4c5678f526014063e486f6
Author: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 22 14:08:13 2009 +0200

    block: implement blkdev_readpages
    
    Doing a proper block dev ->readpages() speeds up the crazy dump(8)
    approach of using interleaved process IO.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>

And:

commit 172124e220f1854acc99ee394671781b8b5e2120
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 4 22:34:44 2009 +0200

    Revert "block: implement blkdev_readpages"
    
    This reverts commit db2dbb12dc47a50c7a4c5678f526014063e486f6.
    
    It apparently causes problems with partition table read-ahead
    on archs with large page sizes. Until that problem is diagnosed
    further, just drop the readpages support on block devices.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>

;-)

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/