[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120201210050.722676273@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:00:42 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@...lsio.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [78/89] rds: Make rds_sock_lock BH rather than IRQ safe.
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
[ Upstream commit efc3dbc37412c027e363736b4f4c74ee5e8ecffc ]
rds_sock_info() triggers locking warnings because we try to perform a
local_bh_enable() (via sock_i_ino()) while hardware interrupts are
disabled (via taking rds_sock_lock).
There is no reason for rds_sock_lock to be a hardware IRQ disabling
lock, none of these access paths run in hardware interrupt context.
Therefore making it a BH disabling lock is safe and sufficient to
fix this bug.
Reported-by: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@...lsio.com>
Reported-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/rds/af_rds.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/net/rds/af_rds.c
+++ b/net/rds/af_rds.c
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ static int rds_release(struct socket *so
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct rds_sock *rs;
- unsigned long flags;
if (!sk)
goto out;
@@ -94,10 +93,10 @@ static int rds_release(struct socket *so
rds_rdma_drop_keys(rs);
rds_notify_queue_get(rs, NULL);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
list_del_init(&rs->rs_item);
rds_sock_count--;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
rds_trans_put(rs->rs_transport);
@@ -409,7 +408,6 @@ static const struct proto_ops rds_proto_
static int __rds_create(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk, int protocol)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct rds_sock *rs;
sock_init_data(sock, sk);
@@ -426,10 +424,10 @@ static int __rds_create(struct socket *s
spin_lock_init(&rs->rs_rdma_lock);
rs->rs_rdma_keys = RB_ROOT;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
list_add_tail(&rs->rs_item, &rds_sock_list);
rds_sock_count++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -471,12 +469,11 @@ static void rds_sock_inc_info(struct soc
{
struct rds_sock *rs;
struct rds_incoming *inc;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int total = 0;
len /= sizeof(struct rds_info_message);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
list_for_each_entry(rs, &rds_sock_list, rs_item) {
read_lock(&rs->rs_recv_lock);
@@ -492,7 +489,7 @@ static void rds_sock_inc_info(struct soc
read_unlock(&rs->rs_recv_lock);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
lens->nr = total;
lens->each = sizeof(struct rds_info_message);
@@ -504,11 +501,10 @@ static void rds_sock_info(struct socket
{
struct rds_info_socket sinfo;
struct rds_sock *rs;
- unsigned long flags;
len /= sizeof(struct rds_info_socket);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
if (len < rds_sock_count)
goto out;
@@ -529,7 +525,7 @@ out:
lens->nr = rds_sock_count;
lens->each = sizeof(struct rds_info_socket);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
}
static void rds_exit(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists