linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] New PT_GNU_COMPAT segment header extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120201141311.05b873ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:13:11 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New PT_GNU_COMPAT segment header extension

On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:54:19 -0500 (EST)
Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...hat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> These patches introduces the PT_GNU_COMPAT segment header to indicate the
> kernel whether an ELF binary or a shared library needs to have all readable
> virtual memory mappings also executable (i.e. READ_IMPLIES_EXEC personality)
> and if necessary, it allows more compatibility modes to be implemented in
> the future.
> 
> Currently, an binary that needs only executable stack have unnecessarily all
> readable virtual memory mappings also executable. This is because the kernel
> does not know if the PF_X flag set in the PT_GNU_STACK segment header of the
> binary indicates it needs only stack executable or all readable virtual
> memory mappings also executable. Consequently, the kernel sets the
> READ_IMPLIES_EXEC personality upon loading any binary with the PT_GNU_STACK
> segment header and the PF_X flag set.
> 
> Furthermore, if the PT_GNU_STACK segment header with the PT_X flag is set in
> any of the shared libraries a binary is linked, the kernel does not know if
> the PF_X flag set in the PT_GNU_STACK segment header of the shared library
> indicates it needs only stack executable or all readable virtual memory
> mappings also executable either. Consequently, GCC sets the PT_GNU_STACK
> segment header with the PF_X flag set upon compiling any binary linked to a
> shared library with the PT_GNU_STACK segment header and the PF_X flag set.
> 
> This can result in applications unnoticeably having not only the stack, but
> also all readable virtual memory mappings also executable. These patches
> returns the original meaning and purpose of the PT_GNU_STACK segment header.
> 
> >From the security standpoint, these binaries will rely upon lesser security
> extensions, such as heap consistency checking and others. Thus, improving
> the security of binaries that needs only the stack executable.
> 
> These patches does not affect the current binaries that have the
> PT_GNU_STACK segment header, neither legacy binaries that most likely does
> not have this segment header either. For the existing binaries that
> necessarily need to have all readable virtual memory mappings also
> executable, the PT_GNU_STACK segment header can be easily converted to a
> PT_GNU_COMPAT segment header without recompilation.
> 
> The following are important details about the changes made to the linker:
> 
>  * The PT_GNU_STACK and PT_GNU_COMPAT segment headers are mutually
>    exclusive.
>  * The PT_GNU_STACK segment header has precedence over the PT_GNU_COMPAT
>    segment header.
>  * The PT_GNU_COMPAT segment header IS NOT created by default.
>  * The PT_GNU_STACK segment header IS ALWAYS created by default--which is
>    the original behaviour of the linker.
> 
> These patches are completely non-intrusive. Over the time, once this
> compatibility mode is no longer needed, they can be removed with no
> subsequent effect.
> 

<I have been poked>

I saw the patch but it's one of those ones which looks tricky/risky,
and is in an area with which I'm not sufficiently familiar.  I used to
ask Roland McGrath to help out with this sort of thing, but he
dematerialised a while back.  Perhaps Linus can give it some thought? 
I'd suggest a resend: you've added useful info in later emails so there
would be benefit to bringing it all together in one place.

A couple of minor things:

- The patch will need a Signed-off-by:, as described in
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

- The term "compat" has a well-understood meaning in the kernel: it
  refers to the support of 32-bit executables under 64-bit kernels. 
  Adding an unrelated PT_GNU_COMPAT muddies this.  Can you think up a
  different term?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/