[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:53:11 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 31/41] rcu: Add CPU-stall capability to
rcutorture
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:41:49AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +/* Spawn CPU-stall kthread, if stall_cpu specified. */
> +static int __init rcu_torture_stall_init(void)
> +{
> + if (stall_cpu <= 0)
> + return 0;
> + stall_task = kthread_run(rcu_torture_stall, NULL, "rcu_torture_stall");
> + if (IS_ERR(stall_task)) {
> + stall_task = NULL;
> + return PTR_ERR(stall_task);
This seems...unlikely to produce the desired result. :)
A quick check turns up the same bug in rcutorture_onoff_init.
This suggests a possible Coccinelle check, for uses of PTR_ERR(foo) after
foo = (any constant other than ERR_PTR(foo)).
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists