[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120202153437.GD2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:34:37 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Subject: Re: [v7 0/8] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:34:25AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 10:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > Could we also apply the same approach to processors busy doing
> > > computational work? In that case the OS is also not needed. Interrupting
> > > these activities is impacting on performance and latency.
> >
> > Yep, that is in fact what Frederic's dyntick-idle userspace work does.
>
> Running in a guest is a special case of running in userspace, so we'd
> need to extend this work to kvm as well.
As long as rcu_idle_enter() is called at the appropriate time, RCU will
happily ignore the CPU. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists