[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:41:11 -0800
From: Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@...gle.com>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Takuo Koguchi <takuo.koguchi.sw@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
jbaron@...hat.com, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Wire up HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> wrote:
> It was my impression that thread_info->syscall is only set in the ptrace path.
The asm-generic/syscall.h kerneldoc says these functions should only be
used in the trace/audit path, not the fast path. I honestly don't recall
any more why I made that a requirement of the interface, but some machines
having this sort of constraint was probably it.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists