[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E950CD52-73DC-404C-A84A-6027CAF7F6E6@dilger.ca>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:25:26 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing boilerplate checks in ->link/->mkdir/->rename
On 2012-02-02, at 2:24 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, there's something we really should've done a long time ago: putting
> that limit into sb->s_max_links. With 0 meaning "leave all checks to
> ->link/->mkdir/->rename". Something like the following would make a
> reasonable start - just the conversion of obvious cases. As the next
> step I'd probably initialize it as ~0U instead of 0 and let the filesystems
> that want something trickier (reiserfs, ext4, gfs2, ocfs2) explicitly set
> it to 0 in their foo_fill_super(). That would take care of a bunch of cases
> where we forgot to do those checks (ubifs, hfsplus, jffs2, ramfs, etc.) and
> it's probably a saner default anyway.
This would also give userspace some hope of pathconf(path, _PC_LINK_MAX)
returning the actual value from the filesystem, instead of hard-coding
this into glibc itself based on the statfs-returned f_type magic value.
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists