linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv20 00/15] Contiguous Memory Allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120203140902.GH5796@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:09:02 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@...aro.org>,
	Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
	Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv20 00/15] Contiguous Memory Allocator

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Welcome everyone again!
> 
> This is yet another quick update on Contiguous Memory Allocator patches.
> This version includes another set of code cleanups requested by Mel
> Gorman and a few minor bug fixes. I really hope that this version will
> be accepted for merging and future development will be handled by
> incremental patches.

FWIW, I've acked all I'm going to ack of this series and made some
suggestions on follow-ups on the core MM parts that could be done
in-tree. I think the current reclaim logic is going to burn CMA with
race conditions but it is a CMA-specific problem so watch out for
that :)

As before, I did not even look at the CMA driver itself or the
arch-specific parts. I'm assuming Arnd has that side of things covered.

Thanks Marek.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/