[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx0SxW5ST2H1TL6K-457nP1qtAva0+YcnJLNoUUz_PCdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:48:08 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: cgroup_release_agent() with call_usermodehelper() with
UMH_WAIT_EXEC may crash
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Can't we simply move that code into flush_old_exec() ? (wrapped into
> the new helper).
Sure. It would kind of make sense to do it as part of exec_mmap().
That's what associates us with the new mm, after all.
That said, I think my *preferred* approach would be to still do the final
set_task_comm(current, tcomm);
in setup_new_exec(), because that's really when we set up the new mm.
So my preferred solution would be to simply move the "char tcomm[];"
array from the stack (currently automatic in setup_new_exec()) into
the struct linux_binprm, and then copy it from the filename early. We
could copy it arbitrarily early, perhaps in "prepare_binprm()".
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists