[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120203024346.GE13456@leaf>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:43:46 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Fix cpuidle_idle_call() RCU usage
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:12:08PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This patch series is a second attempt to fix the idle-loop uses of RCU,
> see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/1/741 for v1. Where the first series
> attempted to drive rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() further down
> into the Linux kernels multitude of idle loops, this patch instead
> marks specific idle-loop operations containing RCU read-side critical
> sections, as suggested by Nicolas Pitre and Steven Rostedt. The possibility
> of code shared between idle and non-idle also requires the ability to nest
> rcu_idle_enter() calls. The individual patches are as follows:
>
> 1. Allow nesting of rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit().
> 2. Add an RCU_NONIDLE() macro to enclose idle-loop code that
> contains RCU read-side critical sections.
> 3. Use RCU_NONIDLE() to protect cpuidle_idle_call()'s tracepoints.
>
> This patchset has the distinct advantage of avoiding touching any
> architecture-specific code. ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 12 ++++++++----
> b/include/linux/rcupdate.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> b/kernel/rcu.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> b/kernel/rcutiny.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> b/kernel/rcutree.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> kernel/rcutiny.c | 2 ++
> kernel/rcutree.c | 2 ++
> 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Looks good to me. Much cleaner.
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists