lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120203221409.GF14209@google.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:14:09 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 11/11] blkcg: unify blkg's for blkcg policies

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:53:49PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hmm... then blkiocg_reset_stats() will run into lock ordering issue. Can't
> hold queue lock inside blkcg lock. I guess you will do some kind of
> locking trick again as you did for io context logic.

Ummm... I don't know the details yet but decisions like making
policies per-queue are much higher level than locking details.  There
are cases where implementation details become problematic enough and
high level decisions are affected but I don't really think that would
be the case here.  It's not like reset stats is a hot path.  In fact,
I don't even understand why the hell we have it.  I guess it's another
blkcg braindamage.

If userland is interested in delta between certain periods, it's
supposed to read values at the start and end of the period and
subtract.  Allowing reset might make sense if there's single bearded
admin looking at the raw numbers, but it breaks as soon as tools and
automation are involved.  How would you decide who owns those
counters?

And we sadly can't even remove that at this point. Ugh................

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ