linux-kernel - Re: Kconfig and toolchain dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:32:59 -0800
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Kconfig and toolchain dependencies

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:29:09PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> It seems relatively straightforward to do if we were to manifest some
> CONFIG_ variables based on the target toolchain, e.g.
> 
> CONFIG_GCC=0x040601
> 
> ... and perhaps do other tests.  I suspect we would run the tests less
> frequently than what we do right now with the tests embedded in the
> Makefile.
> 
> Does anyone have a feel for if this would be a good addition, and if so
> where it best fits into the chain?

This seems like a *great* idea.  Unfortunately, a quick look at the
implementation of kbuild suggests that it doesn't currently implement
numeric comparisons (<, <=, >, >=), only equality (= and !=).  Most of
the time, a Kconfig file will want to write "depends GCC >=
some_version".

Looking at scripts/kconfig/expr.c, it doesn't look that hard to add,
though.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/