linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, v2] checkpatch: Warn on code with 6+ tab indentation, remove 80col warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:48:20 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] checkpatch: Warn on code with 6+ tab indentation,
 remove 80col warning

On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 14:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > > Overly indented code should be refactored.
> > > _AND_ the 80 cols warning should be removed. The overwhelming 
> > > majority of developers either ignore the 80 cols warning or make 
> > > the code worse as a result of the warning.
> > 
> > Perhaps, but it should be a separate patch
> > and you'd still need to update CodingStyle.
> 
> Why would I have to update CodingStyle? The 80col limit remains, 
> it's just removed from *checkpatch*.

If that's your intent, I disagree with your patch.

There are some truly _ugly_ > 80 char lines that
people attempt where checkpatch should issue some
"don't do that" message.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/