linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/47] rcu: Clean up straggling rcu_preempt_needs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  3 Feb 2012 17:44:58 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/47] rcu: Clean up straggling rcu_preempt_needs_cpu() name

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>

The recent updates to RCU_CPU_FAST_NO_HZ have an rcu_needs_cpu() that
does more than just check for callbacks, so get the name for
rcu_preempt_needs_cpu() consistent with that change, now calling it
rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c        |    2 +-
 kernel/rcutree.h        |    2 +-
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 49bb363..0569ba1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
 	/* RCU callbacks either ready or pending? */
 	return per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist ||
 	       per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist ||
-	       rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(cpu);
+	       rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu);
 }
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 05e0367..58c9fc3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 			       bool wake);
 #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) */
 static int rcu_preempt_pending(int cpu);
-static int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(int cpu);
+static int rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu);
 static void __cpuinit rcu_preempt_init_percpu_data(int cpu);
 static void rcu_preempt_cleanup_dying_cpu(void);
 static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 8041310..169517e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -887,9 +887,9 @@ static int rcu_preempt_pending(int cpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * Does preemptible RCU need the CPU to stay out of dynticks mode?
+ * Does preemptible RCU have callbacks on this CPU?
  */
-static int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+static int rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
 {
 	return !!per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).nxtlist;
 }
@@ -1128,9 +1128,9 @@ static int rcu_preempt_pending(int cpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, it never needs any CPU.
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, it never has callbacks
  */
-static int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+static int rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/